Showing posts with label Spain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spain. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
Science and money
The scientist is someone who uses money to generate knowledge. The entrepreneur is someone who uses knowledge to generate money.
Ones needs to understand the process of knowledge generation to understand how it might be transformed into innovation, technology and, eventually, money. Such understanding is surprisingly absent with some people that should know best.
Friday, February 20, 2015
The making of an exhibition
Three years after the exhibition "the making of biodiversity" was inaugurated, the National Museum of Natural Sciences (MNCN) is finally publishing the exhibition's catalogue. The presentation of the catalogue will take place on the 25th of February 2015 at 7 pm in the "Salón de Actos" of the Museum in Madrid. As scientific curator of this exhibition, I wrote the following introductory text that I share with you.
My first memory in life is that of being overwhelmed by the presence of animals
while visiting my grandparents in Africa. Shortly after, I visited one of the
natural history museums in Europe, and my memories of this visit are so vivid today
that I still remember the stairs leading to the main hall of the museum. Why
would these events have such long lasting imprint in my memory? Is it that I am
particularly beset by animals? Or is it that all of us share an innate emotional
affiliation to other living organisms?
One of the most famous biologists of our times, Edward O. Wilson, proposes
the latter. In 1984 he wrote a book, Biophilia,
which sought to provide understanding of how the human tendency to relate with
life might be the expression of a biological need, one that is integral to
humans’ developmental process and essential in physical and mental growth. In
the words of Stephen Kellert, “the biophilia
hypothesis proclaims a human dependence on nature that extends far beyond the
simple issues of material and physical sustenance to encompass as well the
human craving for aesthetic, intellectual, cognitive, and even spiritual
meaning and satisfaction”. In other words, if the biophilia hypothesis is right, our love for nature and for other
living organisms is a need. If the hypothesis is wrong, it is still a fact that
many of us have an innate tendency to be fascinated by other organisms.
As with other types of love, however, the love for life needs to be nurtured.
Nurturing biophilia means promoting sensorial
contact with the diversity of shapes, textures, colors, and odors that
constitute life in our planet (thus creating the emotional connections and
interest to learn more), providing the opportunities for observation and for acquisition
of knowledge regarding the variety of life and the mechanisms that maintain and
promote its evolution (thus providing the intellectual capacity for
understanding the complexity of the natural world), and, finally, providing
information for understanding the current state of biodiversity, our role as
major drivers of change, and the consequences of the current changes for the
future of biodiversity and for our own survival (thus providing the attitudes required
to contribute for the right decisions).
The exhibition “The Making of Biodiversity” launched in 2012 at the National Museum of Natural Sciences (CSIC) in Madrid seeks to provide each one of these three essential elements for full appreciation of biodiversity. In the first part of the exhibition, the visitor will be exposed to the diversity of life as captured by our collections. This is the most beautiful part of the exhibition and one that aims at stimulating the interest and curiosity of the visitor. The second part of the exhibition seeks to provide knowledge about the mechanisms of evolution and diversification of life, which includes both speciation and extinction. This part of the exhibition is the one delving deeper in current ecological and evolutionary theories. The third and last part of the exhibition will provide information about the current status of biodiversity, the strategies required to mitigate some of the most important threats, and some of the projects that researchers at the museum have been engaged to in order to contribute for the conservation of biodiversity in the Iberian Peninsula and beyond.
Thursday, June 14, 2012
The hard choices of Carmen Vela
The Spanish science community is in turmoil because Carmen Vela, the Science Secretary, announced in Nature unprecedented budget cuts of 23.5% for the sector. These are of course terrible news. Her rather displaced tone of optimism irritates many, but she is not the person to blame. She simply is the one in charge of managing those shrinking funds. Whoever will manage the Spanish science budget for 2012 will have to make hard choices, and hard choices will obviously not please everyone.
So what hard choices did she announce? Fewer post-doctoral fellowships and more research money for those getting them.
Such a decision
is of course debatable.
What I primarily need for my work is brains, not money. But my needs are unlikely to represent the needs of the vast majority of my colleagues. Research money is indeed critical to get going with many projects, and especially important when starting a new research programme as an independent researcher.
Moreover,
she has to manage people’s expectations. Many researchers that received
the prestigious ‘Ramón y Cajal’ fellowships failed to get a job in Spain. This caused
frustration among them, because fellowships were presented as a kind of
tenured track position. It was, of course, misleading to present the ‘Ramón y
Cajal’ fellowships as a tenured track, and it was naïve to believe this was the case. What I primarily need for my work is brains, not money. But my needs are unlikely to represent the needs of the vast majority of my colleagues. Research money is indeed critical to get going with many projects, and especially important when starting a new research programme as an independent researcher.
So, one of the hard questions the State Secretary will have to address in 2012 is whether to keep increasing the pool of discontent research fellows that have no chance to be assimilated by the system, or attract slightly fewer researchers but give them more resources to undertake research.
These are, of course, short-term management decisions. The long-term challenge will involve turning the system upside down and scrapping the two-tier system that allows some established researchers to do little, while forcing some of the younger best to give up or go elsewhere.
Spanish bureaucracy - Take I
Take one example. To hire a technician (or a post doc) with project money one has to go through a cumbersome process that involves the so called "bolsa de trabajo". This is a database where anyone can dump their CVs and generate a few keywords to go along. When we open a call, the desired job profile is entered in the "bolsa de trabajo" and any person with keywords that match the call are listed as candidates for the job. This means researchers typically have to evaluate more than 300 of completely hopeless and off-the-point CVs. Of course we never find who we need for a job with such "bolsa de trabajo" and we have to advertise the position through mailings lists and web pages and finally ask the chosen candidates to register in this web page so that they can be "officially" selected. As if this wasn't enough the trade unions managed to win a Court process, which dictates that researchers are mere experts in the selection process. The final decision regarding the candidate ranking has to be approved by trade unions and they have the power to change our decision. So, in addition to preparing the project, obtain funding for it, search for suitable candidates, deal with the "bolsa de trabajo", evaluate >300 hopless CVs, we may have our decision overturned by anonymous trade unionists.
Of course trade unionists, judges, and other bureaucrats alike don't get that science, nowadays, is a Darwinian process. Researchers only get projects if they are competitive, and they are competitive only if they carefully select their staff based on merits rather than surnames.
It surely wasn't by accident that world-famous surrealistic artist, Salvador Dali, was born in Spain.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




